skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(592)
-
▼
January
(54)
- random question of the day
- I am awaiting an onion-style headline on this one
- Good riddance
- variations of sexual mores
- tebow ad, tebow version and some other things that...
- Current Top 20 NCAA
- sotu
- Things that make me say huh?
- tebow v abortion
- dirty dictionary games
- further, second, take
- First Takes
- CU in hell case
- more thoughts on some old ideas
- Citizens United case
- back to torture
- more reasonable posting on the sentiments involved
- Haiti continues: Fuck you edition
- A continued theme of voter stupidity and incurious...
- sigh
- another good question
- good question
- aftermath
- voter irrationality persists
- So what does Massachusetts mean?
- 3.9?
- "resisting arrest for resisting arrest"
- Haiti
- A letter
- are you ready for some, er, hmm
- Speaking of Security
- the continuing saga of countering terrorism, strat...
- Can't believe he did an interview
- A funny game of class
- Reid and Lott
- Things that go round and round
- parody is needed
- Prop 8 goes on trial
- a manifesto against the practice of wearing socks
- As usual, non-rational people make silly decisions
- perhaps you should shut it sir
- In which I continue discussing uncomfortable thing...
- Things economists do know
- I have an idea, terrorism should stop so I stop fe...
- glad you could join us here in sane land George
- more random speculating whilst gesticulating wildly
- more expanding gah
- expanded gah
- gah
- Tell me what's wrong with this
- Prove it
- A listing of personal political crusades that will...
- And checkmate
- Xe
-
▼
January
(54)
Labels
politics
(647)
political philosophy
(432)
economics
(357)
violence channel
(283)
law
(243)
media
(243)
philosophy
(222)
sports
(207)
religion
(206)
news
(196)
war
(159)
crime
(155)
essay
(151)
elections
(149)
history
(147)
personal
(138)
foreign policy
(132)
behavioral evolution
(130)
humor
(128)
racism
(111)
free speech
(101)
health care
(101)
sex
(100)
drugs
(98)
education
(92)
disaster
(79)
movies
(76)
science
(71)
gay rights
(66)
immigration
(64)
money
(49)
bloggers
(48)
tech
(44)
music
(43)
global warming
(39)
torture
(38)
abortion
(36)
polls
(36)
analytic poll questions
(33)
food
(31)
games
(28)
energy
(25)
books
(22)
pretentious poems
(20)
con-science
(19)
language
(19)
cars
(16)
old people
(15)
personality
(13)
my job
(9)
prostitution
(6)
Things I read from time to time
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Campus Unrest: The Legal Framework19 hours ago
-
-
-
-
Software Testing Day1 day ago
-
Youth Drive Cultural Drift1 day ago
-
-
-
-
-
Best Mac Ant-virus For Spyware Protection2 years ago
-
-
-
The End3 years ago
-
-
-
How to Believe in Free Speech5 years ago
-
-
To Russia With Love7 years ago
-
-
A CryptoFiction8 years ago
-
-
Farewell9 years ago
-
Legal Eagles10 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
Posts
2 comments:
Phew. That manslaughter option made me somewhat nervous. I think I'm finally not underestimating how stupid people can be. At least some of the time.
I was confident that the jury would be pretty smart on that one, mostly because it required Roeder to talk. And that's pretty much all anyone would need to see to decide on "he's crazy".
I'm still not sure why the judge even admitted it as a possible defence option myself. Maybe he wanted to get it on the record that this wasn't a defence. I don't know.
Post a Comment