I still think there are strong arguments involved that were not touched on here (provision of health care coverage by employers is an insane way to setup health care coverage, first dollar coverage of a predictable health expenditure doesn't make much sense, we require prescriptions for birth control and thus vastly increase their potential costs to women but don't require prescriptions for condoms, etc), but the "war on religion" invention as a convincing argument was necessary to beat down heavily.
Speaking of which, this was also amusing.
Posts
1 comment:
Somethings really should be commented on, this is 1 of those things. Thank you so a lot
Post a Comment